Next: Conclusion
Up: Numerical examples
Previous: Example 5
In this section we consider an optimal control problem for a semilinear elliptic equation of logistic type which was studied in Leung, Stojanovic
[21,28]. The problem is to determine a distributed control
that minimizes the functional
 |
(4.7) |
subject to the elliptic state equation
 |
(4.8) |
homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions,
 |
|
 |
(4.9) |
and
control and state inequality constraints
|
|
 |
(4.10) |
Figure 11:
Example 6 : Optimal control.
 |
Figure 12:
Example 6 : Optimal state and adjoint variable
 |
Here,
denotes
the population of a biological species,
a spatially dependent
intrinsic growth rate,
the crowding effect, while
denotes the
difference between economic cost and revenue,
with nonnegative constants
.
In [21,28] the function
was chosen as
.
Numerical results for this case can be found in [25].
Here, we consider
if
or
and
otherwise.
The goal is to
find a control function which maximizes profit.
A similar control problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions was recently
studied by Cañada et al. [8].
The adjoint equations (2.10), (2.11) yield the following
equations:
For
, the minimum condition (2.18) gives
the control law
![\begin{displaymath}
\bar{u}(x) = P_{\,[u_1,u_2]}
\left ( \frac{1}{2M}\,[\,(K - \bar{q}(x))\,\bar{y}(x)\,] \right ) \,,
\end{displaymath}](img210.gif) |
(4.11) |
where
denotes the projection operator on the interval
.
The following concrete data were used:
Figure 11 displays the optimal control while Figure 12 shows
the optimal state and adjoint variable.
The reader may verify that the minimum condition given
by the projection (4.11) holds with high accuracy.
However, note that condition (2.7) imposed in [6]
is not satisfied everywhere in
.
Table 7:
Information on solution of Example 6
N+1 |
it |
CPU |
Acc |
 |
50 |
29 |
104 |
8 |
-4.19322 |
100 |
32 |
2235 |
8 |
-4.27569 |
200 |
33 |
42543 |
8 |
-4.31709 |
|
Next: Conclusion
Up: Numerical examples
Previous: Example 5
Hans D. Mittelmann
2000-10-06