Next: Second order sufficient optimality
Up: First and second-order optimality
Previous: First and second-order optimality
Let the control be locally optimal for (P) with associated state ,
i.e.
|
(2.1) |
holds for all satisfying the constraints (1.2-1.4),
where belongs to a sufficiently small -neighborhood of
. Suppose further that
is regular. Then there exist
Lagrange multipliers
(the
adjoint state) and
such that the adjoint
equation
|
(2.2) |
the variational inequality
|
(2.3) |
and the complementary slackness condition
|
(2.4) |
are fulfilled, see [3] or [11]. We mention that (2.3)
is equivalent to the well-known projection property
|
(2.5) |
where
denotes projection onto
. Moreover, we recall that these conditions can be derived by
variational principles applied to the Lagrange function ,
Defining in this way, we tacitly assume that the homogeneous
initial and boundary conditions of are formally included in the state
space. The conditions (2.2-2.3) follow from
for all admissible increments
and
.
Let be given. We define
It holds on and on . These sets indicate
strongly active control constraints.
Next: Second order sufficient optimality
Up: First and second-order optimality
Previous: First and second-order optimality
Hans D. Mittelmann
2003-01-25