Next: Second order sufficient optimality
Up: First and second-order optimality
Previous: First and second-order optimality
Let the control
be locally optimal for (P) with associated state
,
i.e.
 |
(2.1) |
holds for all
satisfying the constraints (1.2-1.4),
where
belongs to a sufficiently small
-neighborhood of
. Suppose further that
is regular. Then there exist
Lagrange multipliers
(the
adjoint state) and
such that the adjoint
equation
 |
(2.2) |
the variational inequality
 |
(2.3) |
and the complementary slackness condition
 |
(2.4) |
are fulfilled, see [3] or [11]. We mention that (2.3)
is equivalent to the well-known projection property
![\begin{displaymath}
\bar{u}(t) = \Pi_{[u_a,u_b]}\{ -\frac{1}{\nu}(\bar{p}(l,t) + a_u(t))\},
\end{displaymath}](img35.gif) |
(2.5) |
where
denotes projection onto
. Moreover, we recall that these conditions can be derived by
variational principles applied to the Lagrange function
,
Defining
in this way, we tacitly assume that the homogeneous
initial and boundary conditions of
are formally included in the state
space. The conditions (2.2-2.3) follow from
for all admissible increments
and
.
Let
be given. We define
It holds
on
and
on
. These sets indicate
strongly active control constraints.
Next: Second order sufficient optimality
Up: First and second-order optimality
Previous: First and second-order optimality
Hans D. Mittelmann
2003-01-25