Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.20.00, build Aug 5 2008 command line - cbc done/swath2.mps At line 1 NAME GAMSMOD At line 7 ROWS At line 893 COLUMNS At line 35862 RHS At line 36265 BOUNDS At line 42991 ENDATA Problem GAMSMOD has 884 rows, 6805 columns and 34965 elements Coin0008I GAMSMOD read with 0 errors Continuous objective value is 334.497 - 0.03 seconds Optimal - objective value 334.497 Cgl0002I 193 variables fixed Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 20 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0004I processed model has 482 rows, 6260 columns (2184 integer) and 25480 elements Cbc0038I Pass 1: suminf. 0.60000 (13) obj. 348.423 iterations 48 Cbc0038I Pass 2: suminf. 0.47500 (11) obj. 393.78 iterations 44 Cbc0038I Pass 3: suminf. 0.40000 (8) obj. 404.45 iterations 6 Cbc0038I Pass 4: suminf. 0.20000 (4) obj. 554.766 iterations 48 Cbc0038I Pass 5: suminf. 1.91429 (5) obj. 549.898 iterations 17 Cbc0038I Pass 6: suminf. 0.00000 (0) obj. 607.112 iterations 8 Cbc0038I Solution found of 607.112 Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 2166 integers at bound fixed and 4003 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 81 rows 62 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound improved solution from 607.112 to 561.878 (0.10 seconds) Cbc0038I Freeing continuous variables gives a solution of 504.153 Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of 487.188 Cbc0038I Pass 7: suminf. 0.60000 (14) obj. 338.031 iterations 39 Cbc0038I Pass 8: suminf. 0.40000 (8) obj. 417.58 iterations 64 Cbc0038I Pass 9: suminf. 0.40000 (8) obj. 417.58 iterations 3 Cbc0038I Pass 10: suminf. 0.40000 (8) obj. 409.21 iterations 14 Cbc0038I Pass 11: suminf. 1.27327 (23) obj. 487.188 iterations 96 Cbc0038I Pass 12: suminf. 0.40000 (9) obj. 487.188 iterations 41 Cbc0038I Pass 13: suminf. 2.25875 (8) obj. 487.188 iterations 291 Cbc0038I Pass 14: suminf. 0.74334 (6) obj. 487.188 iterations 39 Cbc0038I Pass 15: suminf. 2.16105 (7) obj. 487.188 iterations 12 Cbc0038I Pass 16: suminf. 6.28200 (21) obj. 487.188 iterations 101 Cbc0038I Pass 17: suminf. 2.20000 (10) obj. 487.188 iterations 61 Cbc0038I Pass 18: suminf. 3.86859 (11) obj. 487.188 iterations 66 Cbc0038I Pass 19: suminf. 2.57977 (8) obj. 487.188 iterations 51 Cbc0038I Pass 20: suminf. 2.00000 (6) obj. 475.459 iterations 28 Cbc0038I Pass 21: suminf. 2.00000 (6) obj. 475.459 iterations 4 Cbc0038I Pass 22: suminf. 0.20000 (1) obj. 470.899 iterations 14 Cbc0038I Pass 23: suminf. 0.00000 (0) obj. 487.188 iterations 124 Cbc0038I Solution found of 487.188 Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 2119 integers at bound fixed and 3903 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 213 rows 221 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound improved solution from 487.188 to 434.483 (0.59 seconds) Cbc0038I Freeing continuous variables gives a solution of 433.015 Cbc0038I After 0.67 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting with objective of 433.015 - took 0.66 seconds Cbc0012I Integer solution of 433.015 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.67 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 461 rows 2990 columns - 3 fixed gives 447, 2197 - ok now Cbc0031I 6 added rows had average density of 17 Cbc0013I At root node, 6 cuts changed objective from 334.497 to 334.497 in 2 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 0 row cuts, 4 column cuts (2 active) in 0.068 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.004 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 14 row cuts, 0 column cuts (4 active) in 0.008 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.008 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 1 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.008 seconds - new frequency is -100 Optimal - objective value 334.497 Optimal - objective value 334.497 Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 433.015 best solution, best possible 334.497 (0.84 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of 407.443 found by strong branching after 652 iterations and 32 nodes (2.05 seconds) Cbc3008W Strong branching is fixing too many variables, too expensively! Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 465 rows 3205 columns - 4 fixed gives 448, 2238 - ok now Cbc0010I After 100 nodes, 51 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (4.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 200 nodes, 69 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (5.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 300 nodes, 82 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (6.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 400 nodes, 103 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (8.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 500 nodes, 125 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (9.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 600 nodes, 138 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (11.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 700 nodes, 161 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (12.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 800 nodes, 170 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (13.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 900 nodes, 183 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.664 (14.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 207 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.704 (15.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1100 nodes, 224 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (16.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1200 nodes, 233 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (17.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1300 nodes, 247 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (18.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1400 nodes, 272 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (20.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1500 nodes, 278 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (21.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1600 nodes, 294 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (22.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1700 nodes, 312 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (23.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1800 nodes, 323 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (24.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1900 nodes, 339 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (25.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 350 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (26.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2100 nodes, 362 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (27.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2200 nodes, 376 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (29.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2300 nodes, 394 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (30.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2400 nodes, 408 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (31.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2500 nodes, 435 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (32.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2600 nodes, 452 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (33.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2700 nodes, 464 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (35.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2800 nodes, 481 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (36.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2900 nodes, 499 on tree, 407.443 best solution, best possible 334.867 (38.15 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of 400.391 found by strong branching after 56606 iterations and 2911 nodes (38.28 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 468 rows 3364 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 442 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (39.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3100 nodes, 455 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (40.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3200 nodes, 465 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (41.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3300 nodes, 482 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (42.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3400 nodes, 493 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (43.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3500 nodes, 499 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (44.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3600 nodes, 508 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (46.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3700 nodes, 539 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (47.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3800 nodes, 556 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (48.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3900 nodes, 563 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (49.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 565 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (51.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4100 nodes, 578 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (52.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4200 nodes, 587 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (53.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4300 nodes, 589 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (54.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4400 nodes, 598 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (55.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4500 nodes, 606 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (56.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4600 nodes, 608 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (57.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4700 nodes, 611 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.867 (58.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4800 nodes, 618 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (59.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4900 nodes, 637 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (60.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 646 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (62.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5100 nodes, 654 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (63.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5200 nodes, 664 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (64.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5300 nodes, 670 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (65.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5400 nodes, 678 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (66.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5500 nodes, 670 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (67.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5600 nodes, 676 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (68.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5700 nodes, 693 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (69.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5800 nodes, 709 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (70.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5900 nodes, 715 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (72.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 721 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (73.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6100 nodes, 721 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (73.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6200 nodes, 731 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (74.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6300 nodes, 736 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (75.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6400 nodes, 737 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (76.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6500 nodes, 733 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (77.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6600 nodes, 742 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (78.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6700 nodes, 745 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (79.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6800 nodes, 742 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (80.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6900 nodes, 755 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (81.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 760 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (82.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7100 nodes, 783 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (83.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7200 nodes, 789 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (84.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7300 nodes, 788 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (85.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7400 nodes, 786 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (86.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7500 nodes, 794 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (87.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7600 nodes, 803 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (88.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7700 nodes, 805 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (89.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7800 nodes, 813 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (90.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7900 nodes, 819 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (91.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 823 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (92.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8100 nodes, 823 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (93.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8200 nodes, 820 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (94.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8300 nodes, 816 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (95.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8400 nodes, 822 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (96.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8500 nodes, 819 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (97.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8600 nodes, 815 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (97.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8700 nodes, 805 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (98.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8800 nodes, 797 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (99.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8900 nodes, 792 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (100.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 793 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (101.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9100 nodes, 788 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (101.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9200 nodes, 803 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (102.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9300 nodes, 794 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (103.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9400 nodes, 782 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (104.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9500 nodes, 775 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (104.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9600 nodes, 770 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (105.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9700 nodes, 770 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (106.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9800 nodes, 770 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (107.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9900 nodes, 766 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (108.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 764 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (108.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10100 nodes, 760 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (109.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10200 nodes, 756 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (110.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10300 nodes, 783 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (111.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10400 nodes, 811 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (112.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10500 nodes, 828 on tree, 400.391 best solution, best possible 334.869 (113.88 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 398.614 found after 193754 iterations and 10583 nodes (114.60 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 468 rows 3366 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 10600 nodes, 764 on tree, 398.614 best solution, best possible 334.869 (114.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10700 nodes, 772 on tree, 398.614 best solution, best possible 334.869 (116.11 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 396.937 found after 197604 iterations and 10794 nodes (116.97 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 468 rows 3367 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 10800 nodes, 656 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 334.869 (117.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10900 nodes, 650 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 334.869 (118.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 647 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 334.869 (118.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11100 nodes, 694 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 344.722 (119.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11200 nodes, 731 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 348.771 (120.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11300 nodes, 770 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 351.717 (121.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11400 nodes, 806 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 353.267 (122.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11500 nodes, 842 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 354.422 (123.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11600 nodes, 878 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 355.584 (124.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11700 nodes, 918 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 356.598 (125.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11800 nodes, 956 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 357.257 (126.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11900 nodes, 998 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 357.747 (127.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 1030 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 358.315 (127.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12100 nodes, 1074 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 358.657 (128.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12200 nodes, 1116 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 358.877 (129.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12300 nodes, 1141 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 359.256 (130.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12400 nodes, 1176 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 359.599 (131.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12500 nodes, 1207 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 359.891 (132.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12600 nodes, 1237 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 360.095 (132.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12700 nodes, 1276 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 360.309 (133.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12800 nodes, 1316 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 360.653 (134.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12900 nodes, 1337 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 360.878 (135.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 1361 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (136.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13100 nodes, 1364 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (136.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13200 nodes, 1365 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (137.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13300 nodes, 1370 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (138.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13400 nodes, 1378 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (139.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13500 nodes, 1403 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (139.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13600 nodes, 1407 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (140.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13700 nodes, 1415 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (141.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13800 nodes, 1430 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (142.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13900 nodes, 1440 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (143.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 1442 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.116 (143.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14100 nodes, 1471 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.511 (144.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14200 nodes, 1510 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 361.808 (145.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14300 nodes, 1551 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 362.058 (146.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14400 nodes, 1583 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 362.478 (147.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14500 nodes, 1603 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 362.965 (148.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14600 nodes, 1618 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 363.338 (148.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14700 nodes, 1651 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 363.628 (149.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14800 nodes, 1676 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 363.972 (150.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14900 nodes, 1709 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 364.193 (151.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 1732 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 364.427 (152.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15100 nodes, 1761 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 364.646 (152.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15200 nodes, 1791 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 364.927 (153.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15300 nodes, 1815 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.148 (154.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15400 nodes, 1849 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.335 (155.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15500 nodes, 1881 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.506 (156.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15600 nodes, 1908 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.705 (156.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15700 nodes, 1934 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.835 (157.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15800 nodes, 1962 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 365.993 (158.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15900 nodes, 1986 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 366.215 (159.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16000 nodes, 2013 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 366.416 (159.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16100 nodes, 2042 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 366.595 (160.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16200 nodes, 2070 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 366.72 (161.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16300 nodes, 2100 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 366.865 (162.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16400 nodes, 2125 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.012 (163.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16500 nodes, 2144 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.146 (163.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16600 nodes, 2165 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.252 (164.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16700 nodes, 2182 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.348 (165.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16800 nodes, 2197 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.473 (166.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16900 nodes, 2218 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.611 (167.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17000 nodes, 2235 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (167.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17100 nodes, 2228 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (168.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17200 nodes, 2225 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (169.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17300 nodes, 2227 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (170.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17400 nodes, 2231 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (170.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17500 nodes, 2237 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (171.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17600 nodes, 2241 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (172.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17700 nodes, 2239 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (172.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17800 nodes, 2241 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (173.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17900 nodes, 2236 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (174.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18000 nodes, 2227 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.732 (175.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18100 nodes, 2239 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.884 (175.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18200 nodes, 2258 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 367.984 (176.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18300 nodes, 2277 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.076 (177.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18400 nodes, 2297 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.208 (178.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18500 nodes, 2317 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.314 (178.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18600 nodes, 2334 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.423 (179.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18700 nodes, 2344 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.536 (180.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18800 nodes, 2357 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.653 (181.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18900 nodes, 2374 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.778 (181.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19000 nodes, 2389 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.881 (182.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19100 nodes, 2401 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 368.986 (183.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19200 nodes, 2410 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.094 (184.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19300 nodes, 2423 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.193 (185.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19400 nodes, 2444 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.332 (186.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19500 nodes, 2459 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.421 (187.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19600 nodes, 2475 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.545 (187.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19700 nodes, 2493 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.684 (188.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19800 nodes, 2505 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.818 (189.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19900 nodes, 2521 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 369.97 (190.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20000 nodes, 2537 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.088 (191.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20100 nodes, 2564 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.195 (192.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20200 nodes, 2585 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.281 (193.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20300 nodes, 2600 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.361 (193.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20400 nodes, 2623 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.43 (194.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20500 nodes, 2640 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.529 (195.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20600 nodes, 2654 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.62 (196.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20700 nodes, 2670 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.717 (196.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20800 nodes, 2686 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.813 (197.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20900 nodes, 2703 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.891 (198.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21000 nodes, 2720 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (199.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21100 nodes, 2715 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (199.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21200 nodes, 2714 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (200.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21300 nodes, 2701 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (201.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21400 nodes, 2704 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (201.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21500 nodes, 2700 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (202.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21600 nodes, 2698 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (203.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21700 nodes, 2694 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (204.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21800 nodes, 2693 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (204.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21900 nodes, 2692 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (205.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22000 nodes, 2684 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 370.99 (206.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22100 nodes, 2701 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.093 (206.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22200 nodes, 2723 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.176 (207.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22300 nodes, 2740 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.273 (208.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22400 nodes, 2763 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.342 (208.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22500 nodes, 2786 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.402 (209.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22600 nodes, 2808 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.481 (210.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22700 nodes, 2823 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.579 (210.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22800 nodes, 2838 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.652 (211.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22900 nodes, 2856 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.762 (212.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23000 nodes, 2865 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 371.883 (213.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23100 nodes, 2874 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.023 (213.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23200 nodes, 2887 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.171 (214.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23300 nodes, 2895 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.327 (215.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23400 nodes, 2901 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.429 (216.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23500 nodes, 2910 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.511 (216.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23600 nodes, 2921 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.602 (217.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23700 nodes, 2930 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.696 (218.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23800 nodes, 2937 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.782 (219.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23900 nodes, 2948 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.858 (219.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24000 nodes, 2965 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.913 (220.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24100 nodes, 2984 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 372.996 (221.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24200 nodes, 2998 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.079 (221.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24300 nodes, 3015 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.152 (222.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24400 nodes, 3021 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.254 (223.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24500 nodes, 3024 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.341 (224.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24600 nodes, 3030 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.449 (224.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24700 nodes, 3039 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.532 (225.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24800 nodes, 3047 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.64 (226.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24900 nodes, 3049 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.708 (226.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25000 nodes, 3058 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (227.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25100 nodes, 3043 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (228.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25200 nodes, 3040 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (229.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25300 nodes, 3031 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (229.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25400 nodes, 3024 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (230.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25500 nodes, 3017 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (231.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25600 nodes, 3014 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (231.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25700 nodes, 3012 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (232.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25800 nodes, 3009 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (233.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25900 nodes, 3003 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (233.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26000 nodes, 3001 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.804 (234.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26100 nodes, 3005 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 373.897 (235.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26200 nodes, 3019 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.015 (235.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26300 nodes, 3028 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.114 (236.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26400 nodes, 3038 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.223 (237.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26500 nodes, 3050 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.338 (237.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26600 nodes, 3069 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.459 (238.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26700 nodes, 3080 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.57 (239.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26800 nodes, 3102 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.667 (240.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26900 nodes, 3125 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.738 (240.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27000 nodes, 3142 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.796 (241.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27100 nodes, 3161 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.868 (242.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27200 nodes, 3178 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 374.954 (243.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27300 nodes, 3194 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.014 (243.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27400 nodes, 3207 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.094 (244.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27500 nodes, 3218 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.154 (245.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27600 nodes, 3225 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.218 (246.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27700 nodes, 3247 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.293 (246.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27800 nodes, 3257 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.356 (247.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27900 nodes, 3275 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.416 (248.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28000 nodes, 3275 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.501 (248.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28100 nodes, 3282 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.583 (249.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28200 nodes, 3286 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.669 (250.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28300 nodes, 3295 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.746 (250.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28400 nodes, 3304 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.847 (251.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28500 nodes, 3309 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.905 (252.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28600 nodes, 3322 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 375.981 (253.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28700 nodes, 3324 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.067 (253.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28800 nodes, 3336 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.142 (254.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28900 nodes, 3341 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.207 (255.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29000 nodes, 3343 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (256.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29100 nodes, 3312 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (256.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29200 nodes, 3303 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (257.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29300 nodes, 3295 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (257.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29400 nodes, 3291 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (258.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29500 nodes, 3282 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (259.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29600 nodes, 3277 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (259.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29700 nodes, 3271 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (260.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29800 nodes, 3265 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (261.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 29900 nodes, 3247 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (261.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30000 nodes, 3237 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.291 (262.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30100 nodes, 3250 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.375 (262.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30200 nodes, 3264 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.46 (263.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30300 nodes, 3278 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.533 (264.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30400 nodes, 3291 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.595 (265.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30500 nodes, 3301 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.697 (265.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30600 nodes, 3313 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.78 (266.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30700 nodes, 3323 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.863 (267.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30800 nodes, 3335 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 376.929 (268.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30900 nodes, 3338 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.003 (268.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31000 nodes, 3344 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.095 (269.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31100 nodes, 3350 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.162 (270.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31200 nodes, 3361 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.237 (271.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31300 nodes, 3372 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.312 (271.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31400 nodes, 3376 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.384 (272.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31500 nodes, 3382 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.454 (273.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31600 nodes, 3390 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.548 (273.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31700 nodes, 3394 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.632 (274.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31800 nodes, 3400 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.697 (275.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31900 nodes, 3405 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.778 (276.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32000 nodes, 3414 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.83 (277.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32100 nodes, 3425 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.898 (277.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32200 nodes, 3436 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 377.953 (278.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32300 nodes, 3449 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.018 (279.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32400 nodes, 3453 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.078 (279.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32500 nodes, 3469 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.132 (280.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32600 nodes, 3484 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.205 (281.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32700 nodes, 3492 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.26 (282.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32800 nodes, 3499 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.311 (282.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32900 nodes, 3500 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.37 (283.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33000 nodes, 3507 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.445 (284.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33100 nodes, 3489 on tree, 396.937 best solution, best possible 378.445 (284.94 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of 391.252 found by strong branching after 485629 iterations and 33119 nodes (285.12 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 469 rows 3422 columns - too large Cbc0016I Integer solution of 391.231 found by strong branching after 485696 iterations and 33121 nodes (285.32 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 469 rows 3423 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 33200 nodes, 2158 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.51 (285.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33300 nodes, 2158 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.597 (286.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33400 nodes, 2155 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.649 (287.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33500 nodes, 2157 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.697 (287.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33600 nodes, 2158 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.77 (288.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33700 nodes, 2160 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.837 (289.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33800 nodes, 2158 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.907 (289.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33900 nodes, 2162 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 378.988 (290.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34000 nodes, 2162 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.059 (291.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34100 nodes, 2164 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.109 (292.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34200 nodes, 2163 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.171 (292.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34300 nodes, 2162 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.227 (293.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34400 nodes, 2162 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.29 (294.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34500 nodes, 2160 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.366 (294.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34600 nodes, 2165 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.43 (295.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34700 nodes, 2167 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.533 (296.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34800 nodes, 2169 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.6 (296.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34900 nodes, 2170 on tree, 391.231 best solution, best possible 379.685 (297.75 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 385.576 found after 499937 iterations and 34942 nodes (298.07 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 469 rows 3424 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 35000 nodes, 1148 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 379.763 (298.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35100 nodes, 1136 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 379.849 (299.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35200 nodes, 1128 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 379.927 (300.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35300 nodes, 1118 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 379.995 (300.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35400 nodes, 1110 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.077 (301.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35500 nodes, 1102 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.19 (301.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35600 nodes, 1094 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.273 (302.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35700 nodes, 1079 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.363 (303.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35800 nodes, 1067 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.473 (303.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35900 nodes, 1054 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.608 (304.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36000 nodes, 1042 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.708 (305.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36100 nodes, 1030 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.817 (305.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36200 nodes, 1018 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 380.896 (306.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36300 nodes, 1006 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.006 (307.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36400 nodes, 987 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.139 (307.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36500 nodes, 971 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.281 (308.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36600 nodes, 955 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.386 (309.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36700 nodes, 942 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.494 (309.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36800 nodes, 934 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.594 (310.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36900 nodes, 923 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.694 (311.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37000 nodes, 908 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.793 (312.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37100 nodes, 879 on tree, 385.576 best solution, best possible 381.793 (313.04 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 385.2 found after 518917 iterations and 37117 nodes (313.15 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 482 rows 6260 columns, reduced to 469 rows 3427 columns - too large Cbc0010I After 37200 nodes, 745 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 381.879 (313.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37300 nodes, 725 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 381.999 (314.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37400 nodes, 700 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.136 (315.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37500 nodes, 677 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.322 (316.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37600 nodes, 655 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.512 (317.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37700 nodes, 631 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.624 (317.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37800 nodes, 610 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.777 (318.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 37900 nodes, 592 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.893 (319.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38000 nodes, 576 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 382.998 (319.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38100 nodes, 557 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.12 (320.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38200 nodes, 521 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.225 (321.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38300 nodes, 490 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.352 (321.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38400 nodes, 465 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.501 (322.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38500 nodes, 439 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.637 (323.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38600 nodes, 410 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.732 (323.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38700 nodes, 380 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.888 (324.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38800 nodes, 354 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 383.997 (324.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38900 nodes, 324 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.102 (325.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39000 nodes, 295 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.236 (326.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39100 nodes, 274 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.323 (326.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39200 nodes, 237 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.446 (327.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39300 nodes, 198 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.581 (327.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39400 nodes, 169 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.662 (328.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39500 nodes, 138 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.764 (328.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39600 nodes, 99 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 384.887 (329.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39700 nodes, 55 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 385.014 (329.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39800 nodes, 15 on tree, 385.2 best solution, best possible 385.138 (330.56 seconds) Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective 385.19969295, took 541143 iterations and 39832 nodes (330.73 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 11438 times (255669 iterations), fathomed 389 nodes and fixed 2346 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 123, 1.86629e+06 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from 334.497 to 334.497 Probing was tried 7956 times and created 1124 cuts of which 883 were active after adding rounds of cuts (12.321 seconds) Gomory was tried 2 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.004 seconds) Knapsack was tried 2 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Clique was tried 2 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 7956 times and created 7688 cuts of which 4114 were active after adding rounds of cuts (18.421 seconds) FlowCover was tried 2 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.008 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 2 times and created 1 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.008 seconds) Result - Finished objective 385.19969295 after 39832 nodes and 541143 iterations - took 331.22 seconds (total time 331.28) Total time 331.49 331.49user 0.15system 5:31.67elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+20706minor)pagefaults 0swaps