Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.20.00, build Sep 22 2008 command line - cbc done/pk1.mps At line 1 NAME PK1 At line 2 ROWS At line 49 COLUMNS At line 538 RHS At line 547 BOUNDS At line 603 ENDATA Problem PK1 has 45 rows, 86 columns and 915 elements Coin0008I PK1 read with 0 errors Continuous objective value is 0 - 0.00 seconds Optimal - objective value 0 Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 30 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0004I processed model has 45 rows, 86 columns (55 integer) and 915 elements Objective coefficients multiple of 1 Cutoff increment increased from 1e-05 to 0.999 Cbc0038I Pass 1: suminf. 0.00000 (0) obj. 68 iterations 35 Cbc0038I Solution found of 68 Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 40 integers at bound fixed and 15 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 30 rows 31 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound improved solution from 68 to 52 (0.04 seconds) Cbc0038I Freeing continuous variables gives a solution of 52 Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of 45 Cbc0038I Pass 2: suminf. 0.46000 (2) obj. 45 iterations 31 Cbc0038I Pass 3: suminf. 0.00000 (0) obj. 43 iterations 20 Cbc0038I Solution found of 43 Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 40 integers at bound fixed and 1 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 44 rows 45 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound improved solution from 43 to 23 (0.10 seconds) Cbc0038I After 0.10 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting with objective of 23 - took 0.10 seconds Cbc0012I Integer solution of 23 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.10 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 37 rows 47 columns Cbc0031I 3 added rows had average density of 86 Cbc0013I At root node, 3 cuts changed objective from 0 to 0 in 100 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.128 seconds - new frequency is 1000 Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 1634 row cuts, 0 column cuts (3 active) in 0.020 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.004 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.008 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 17 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.108 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.024 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 112 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.024 seconds - new frequency is -100 Optimal - objective value 0 Optimal - objective value 0 Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 23 best solution, best possible 0 (0.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 85 on tree, 23 best solution, best possible 0 (2.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 96 on tree, 23 best solution, best possible 0 (3.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 104 on tree, 23 best solution, best possible 0 (3.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 134 on tree, 23 best solution, best possible 0 (4.23 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 21 found after 67453 iterations and 4670 nodes (4.54 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 62 columns Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 305 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (5.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 816 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (5.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 1292 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (6.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 1792 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (6.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 2291 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (7.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 2792 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (7.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 3289 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0 (8.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 3789 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 0.582702 (9.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 4289 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 2.05352 (9.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 4770 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 2.05459 (10.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 5270 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 2.59481 (11.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16000 nodes, 5770 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 2.95974 (11.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17000 nodes, 6269 on tree, 21 best solution, best possible 3.2015 (12.40 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 17 found after 344328 iterations and 17513 nodes (12.80 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 66 columns Cbc0010I After 18000 nodes, 6669 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.20183 (13.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19000 nodes, 7169 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.45819 (13.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20000 nodes, 7669 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.64663 (14.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21000 nodes, 8168 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.7982 (15.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22000 nodes, 8647 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.7982 (15.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 23000 nodes, 9146 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 3.94965 (16.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 24000 nodes, 9646 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 4.09748 (16.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 25000 nodes, 10145 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 4.23161 (17.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 26000 nodes, 10641 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 4.34283 (17.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 27000 nodes, 11109 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 4.34283 (18.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 28000 nodes, 11563 on tree, 17 best solution, best possible 4.34283 (19.35 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 16 found after 564725 iterations and 28036 nodes (19.36 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 69 columns Cbc0010I After 29000 nodes, 11889 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.34283 (20.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 30000 nodes, 12388 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.48225 (20.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 31000 nodes, 12846 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.48232 (21.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 32000 nodes, 13266 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.48232 (22.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 33000 nodes, 13142 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.48232 (22.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 34000 nodes, 13641 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.61767 (22.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 35000 nodes, 14083 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.61767 (23.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 36000 nodes, 14526 on tree, 16 best solution, best possible 4.6194 (24.36 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 15 found after 737787 iterations and 36073 nodes (24.37 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 72 columns Cbc0010I After 37000 nodes, 14697 on tree, 15 best solution, best possible 4.6194 (25.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 38000 nodes, 15189 on tree, 15 best solution, best possible 4.81188 (25.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 39000 nodes, 15633 on tree, 15 best solution, best possible 4.81194 (26.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 40000 nodes, 16077 on tree, 15 best solution, best possible 4.81194 (27.12 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 14 found after 827924 iterations and 40234 nodes (27.19 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 72 columns Cbc0010I After 41000 nodes, 15993 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 4.81194 (27.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 42000 nodes, 16477 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.02848 (28.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 43000 nodes, 16884 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.02848 (29.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 44000 nodes, 17286 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.02848 (29.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 45000 nodes, 17121 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.02848 (30.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 46000 nodes, 17603 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.21189 (30.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 47000 nodes, 17975 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.21189 (31.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 48000 nodes, 18353 on tree, 14 best solution, best possible 5.21387 (32.05 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 12 found after 997714 iterations and 48870 nodes (32.29 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 75 columns Cbc0010I After 49000 nodes, 16390 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.25079 (32.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 50000 nodes, 16810 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.37871 (33.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 51000 nodes, 17121 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.37871 (33.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 52000 nodes, 17455 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.37871 (34.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 53000 nodes, 17194 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.37871 (34.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 54000 nodes, 17630 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.56896 (35.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 55000 nodes, 17899 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.57096 (36.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 56000 nodes, 18196 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.57096 (36.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 57000 nodes, 17934 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.57096 (37.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 58000 nodes, 18356 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.72902 (37.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 59000 nodes, 18598 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.72902 (38.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 60000 nodes, 18824 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.72903 (39.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 61000 nodes, 18629 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.72903 (39.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 62000 nodes, 19040 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.8528 (40.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 63000 nodes, 19279 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.8528 (40.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 64000 nodes, 19519 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.8528 (41.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 65000 nodes, 19273 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.8528 (42.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 66000 nodes, 19681 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.98065 (42.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 67000 nodes, 19898 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.98065 (43.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 68000 nodes, 20121 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.98095 (43.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 69000 nodes, 19935 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 5.98095 (44.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 70000 nodes, 20335 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.10003 (44.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 71000 nodes, 20540 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.10003 (45.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 72000 nodes, 20728 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.10003 (46.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 73000 nodes, 20432 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.10003 (46.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 74000 nodes, 20827 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.20709 (47.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 75000 nodes, 21049 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.20709 (47.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 76000 nodes, 21262 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.20709 (48.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 77000 nodes, 21035 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.20709 (48.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 78000 nodes, 21417 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.31453 (49.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 79000 nodes, 21586 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.31453 (50.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 80000 nodes, 21731 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.3146 (51.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 81000 nodes, 21411 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.3146 (51.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 82000 nodes, 21791 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.4258 (52.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 83000 nodes, 21963 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.4258 (53.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 84000 nodes, 22089 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.4258 (53.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 85000 nodes, 21850 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.4258 (54.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 86000 nodes, 22233 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.52798 (55.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 87000 nodes, 22390 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.52798 (55.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 88000 nodes, 22501 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.52798 (56.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 89000 nodes, 22178 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.52798 (57.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 90000 nodes, 22546 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.62536 (57.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 91000 nodes, 22700 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.62536 (58.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 92000 nodes, 22816 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.62536 (59.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 93000 nodes, 22473 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.62536 (59.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 94000 nodes, 22832 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.71712 (60.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 95000 nodes, 22962 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.71712 (61.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 96000 nodes, 23072 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.71712 (61.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 97000 nodes, 22854 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.71712 (62.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 98000 nodes, 23228 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.81887 (63.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 99000 nodes, 23360 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.81887 (63.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 100000 nodes, 23471 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.81887 (64.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 101000 nodes, 23289 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.81887 (64.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 102000 nodes, 23653 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.91221 (65.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 103000 nodes, 23767 on tree, 12 best solution, best possible 6.91221 (66.48 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of 11 found after 1979858 iterations and 103519 nodes (66.84 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 45 rows 86 columns, reduced to 45 rows 75 columns Cbc0010I After 104000 nodes, 19661 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 6.95412 (67.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 105000 nodes, 19254 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 6.95412 (68.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 106000 nodes, 19508 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.04893 (68.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 107000 nodes, 19518 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.04893 (69.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 108000 nodes, 19484 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.04893 (70.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 109000 nodes, 19148 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.04893 (70.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 110000 nodes, 19392 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.14085 (71.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 111000 nodes, 19352 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.14085 (71.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 112000 nodes, 19310 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.14085 (72.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 113000 nodes, 18944 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.14085 (72.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 114000 nodes, 19178 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.23235 (73.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 115000 nodes, 19109 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.23235 (74.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 116000 nodes, 19020 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.23235 (74.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 117000 nodes, 18677 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.23235 (75.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 118000 nodes, 18911 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.32367 (76.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 119000 nodes, 18838 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.32367 (76.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 120000 nodes, 18747 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.32367 (77.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 121000 nodes, 18392 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.32367 (77.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 122000 nodes, 18618 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.41183 (78.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 123000 nodes, 18561 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.41183 (79.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 124000 nodes, 18481 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.41183 (79.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 125000 nodes, 18174 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.41183 (80.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 126000 nodes, 18372 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.49624 (80.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 127000 nodes, 18298 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.49624 (81.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 128000 nodes, 18171 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.49624 (81.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 129000 nodes, 17800 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.49624 (82.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 130000 nodes, 17963 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.58603 (83.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 131000 nodes, 17824 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.58603 (83.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 132000 nodes, 17725 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.58603 (84.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 133000 nodes, 17437 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.58603 (84.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 134000 nodes, 17644 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.66852 (85.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 135000 nodes, 17536 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.66852 (85.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 136000 nodes, 17425 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.66852 (86.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 137000 nodes, 17104 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.66852 (86.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 138000 nodes, 17286 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.75287 (87.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 139000 nodes, 17149 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.75289 (88.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 140000 nodes, 16990 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.75289 (88.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 141000 nodes, 16608 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.75289 (89.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 142000 nodes, 16764 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.83276 (89.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 143000 nodes, 16625 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.83276 (90.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 144000 nodes, 16443 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.83276 (90.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 145000 nodes, 16008 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.83276 (91.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 146000 nodes, 16160 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.91356 (92.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 147000 nodes, 16030 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.91356 (92.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 148000 nodes, 15878 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.91356 (93.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 149000 nodes, 15623 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.91356 (93.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 150000 nodes, 15759 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.99568 (94.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 151000 nodes, 15609 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.99568 (94.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 152000 nodes, 15423 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.99568 (95.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 153000 nodes, 15102 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 7.99568 (95.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 154000 nodes, 15246 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.07125 (96.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 155000 nodes, 15049 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.07125 (96.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 156000 nodes, 14852 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.07125 (97.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 157000 nodes, 14410 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.07125 (97.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 158000 nodes, 14520 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.14603 (98.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 159000 nodes, 14344 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.14603 (99.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 160000 nodes, 14132 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.14603 (99.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 161000 nodes, 13670 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.14603 (99.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 162000 nodes, 13758 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.21639 (100.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 163000 nodes, 13553 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.21639 (101.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 164000 nodes, 13366 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.21639 (101.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 165000 nodes, 13061 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.21639 (101.97 seconds) Cbc0010I After 166000 nodes, 13128 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.28866 (102.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 167000 nodes, 12928 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.28866 (103.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 168000 nodes, 12717 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.28866 (103.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 169000 nodes, 12300 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.28866 (103.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 170000 nodes, 12382 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.36154 (104.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 171000 nodes, 12146 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.36154 (105.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 172000 nodes, 11933 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.36154 (105.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 173000 nodes, 11524 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.36154 (105.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 174000 nodes, 11551 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.43837 (106.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 175000 nodes, 11337 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.43837 (107.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 176000 nodes, 11115 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.43837 (107.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 177000 nodes, 10835 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.43837 (107.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 178000 nodes, 10862 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.5066 (108.54 seconds) Cbc0010I After 179000 nodes, 10622 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.5066 (109.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 180000 nodes, 10363 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.5066 (109.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 181000 nodes, 10015 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.5066 (109.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 182000 nodes, 10054 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.57763 (110.48 seconds) Cbc0010I After 183000 nodes, 9801 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.57763 (110.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 184000 nodes, 9796 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.64807 (111.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 185000 nodes, 9822 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.71598 (112.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 186000 nodes, 9511 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.71598 (112.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 187000 nodes, 9504 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.79101 (113.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 188000 nodes, 9471 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.85049 (113.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 189000 nodes, 9433 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.91259 (114.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 190000 nodes, 9119 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.91259 (114.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 191000 nodes, 9068 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 8.97614 (115.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 192000 nodes, 9005 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.03676 (115.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 193000 nodes, 8873 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.0811 (116.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 194000 nodes, 8517 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.0811 (116.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 195000 nodes, 8378 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.12076 (117.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 196000 nodes, 8216 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.15771 (117.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 197000 nodes, 8063 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.19553 (118.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 198000 nodes, 7666 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.19553 (118.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 199000 nodes, 7514 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.23353 (119.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 200000 nodes, 7309 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.27062 (119.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 201000 nodes, 7104 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.30714 (120.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 202000 nodes, 6686 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.30714 (120.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 203000 nodes, 6500 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.34373 (120.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 204000 nodes, 6296 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.37984 (121.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 205000 nodes, 6078 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.41774 (121.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 206000 nodes, 5639 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.41774 (122.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 207000 nodes, 5372 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.45579 (122.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 208000 nodes, 5153 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.49227 (123.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 209000 nodes, 4916 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.52737 (123.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 210000 nodes, 4490 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.52737 (123.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 211000 nodes, 4200 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.57537 (124.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 212000 nodes, 3915 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.61392 (124.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 213000 nodes, 3611 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.65301 (125.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 214000 nodes, 3190 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.65341 (125.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 215000 nodes, 2878 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.70877 (126.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 216000 nodes, 2522 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.7485 (126.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 217000 nodes, 2125 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.79096 (126.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 218000 nodes, 1673 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.79097 (127.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 219000 nodes, 1284 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.86455 (127.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 220000 nodes, 832 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.91448 (128.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 221000 nodes, 357 on tree, 11 best solution, best possible 9.96736 (128.41 seconds) Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective 11, took 3534672 iterations and 221721 nodes (128.68 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 12544 times (123144 iterations), fathomed 275 nodes and fixed 1078 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 50, 551427 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from 0 to 0 Probing was tried 73263 times and created 9270 cuts of which 135 were active after adding rounds of cuts (10.613 seconds) Gomory was tried 46519 times and created 422509 cuts of which 54583 were active after adding rounds of cuts (7.048 seconds) Knapsack was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.004 seconds) Clique was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.008 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 100 times and created 17 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.108 seconds) FlowCover was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.024 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 100 times and created 112 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.024 seconds) Result - Finished objective 11 after 221721 nodes and 3534672 iterations - took 128.69 seconds (total time 128.70) Total time 128.70 128.70user 2.42system 2:11.14elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1113980minor)pagefaults 0swaps