Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.20.00, build Sep 22 2008 command line - cbc done/mzzv11.mps At line 1 NAME mzzv11 At line 2 ROWS At line 9503 COLUMNS At line 80338 RHS At line 83244 BOUNDS At line 93493 ENDATA Problem mzzv11 has 9499 rows, 10240 columns and 134603 elements Coin0008I mzzv11 read with 0 errors Continuous objective value is -22945.2 - 12.77 seconds Optimal - objective value -22945.2 Cgl0003I 282 fixed, 171 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 26 substitutions Cgl0003I 286 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 32 fixed, 1 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 27 substitutions Cgl0003I 39 fixed, 1 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 36 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 22 substitutions Cgl0003I 18 fixed, 1 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 13 substitutions Cgl0003I 3 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 14 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 7 substitutions Cgl0004I processed model has 8724 rows, 9144 columns (9144 integer) and 127650 elements Objective coefficients multiple of 2 Cutoff increment increased from 1e-05 to 1.998 Cbc0038I Pass 1: (4.04 seconds) suminf. 6.76667 (22) obj. -9757.33 iterations 7377 Cbc0038I Pass 2: (4.10 seconds) suminf. 6.33333 (25) obj. -9757.33 iterations 162 Cbc0038I Pass 3: (4.15 seconds) suminf. 3.16667 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 97 Cbc0038I Pass 4: (4.19 seconds) suminf. 1.33333 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 63 Cbc0038I Pass 5: (4.50 seconds) suminf. 1.33333 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 776 Cbc0038I Pass 6: (4.91 seconds) suminf. 1.33333 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 755 Cbc0038I Pass 7: (5.80 seconds) suminf. 1.33333 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 1187 Cbc0038I Pass 8: (6.95 seconds) suminf. 2.23810 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 1536 Cbc0038I Pass 9: (7.72 seconds) suminf. 2.16667 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 1021 Cbc0038I Pass 10: (7.76 seconds) suminf. 2.33333 (9) obj. -9800 iterations 31 Cbc0038I Pass 11: (8.44 seconds) suminf. 2.83333 (12) obj. -9816 iterations 1124 Cbc0038I Pass 12: (8.90 seconds) suminf. 2.33333 (9) obj. -9816 iterations 776 Cbc0038I Pass 13: (8.93 seconds) suminf. 2.16667 (9) obj. -9816 iterations 24 Cbc0038I Pass 14: (9.65 seconds) suminf. 2.16667 (9) obj. -9846 iterations 1128 Cbc0038I Pass 15: (10.21 seconds) suminf. 2.16667 (9) obj. -9846 iterations 820 Cbc0038I Pass 16: (10.24 seconds) suminf. 2.33333 (9) obj. -9846 iterations 34 Cbc0038I Pass 17: (10.85 seconds) suminf. 2.33333 (9) obj. -9746 iterations 1058 Cbc0038I Pass 18: (11.60 seconds) suminf. 2.33333 (9) obj. -9746 iterations 928 Cbc0038I Pass 19: (11.64 seconds) suminf. 2.16667 (9) obj. -9746 iterations 57 Cbc0038I Pass 20: (12.66 seconds) suminf. 2.38095 (10) obj. -9846 iterations 1351 Cbc0038I No solution found this major pass Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 8000 integers at bound fixed and 0 continuous of which 13 were internal integer and 0 internal continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 8724 rows 9144 columns, reduced to 921 rows 424 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (13.13 seconds) Cbc0038I After 13.13 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting - took 13.09 seconds Cbc0031I 115 added rows had average density of 120.287 Cbc0013I At root node, 115 cuts changed objective from -22945.2 to -22199.1 in 16 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 815 row cuts, 0 column cuts (115 active) in 3.540 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 2852 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 4.984 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 45 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.320 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 1853 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.320 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 13 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.256 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 4 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.172 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 1087 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 3.064 seconds - new frequency is -100 Optimal - objective value -22199.1 Optimal - objective value -22199.1 Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -22199.1 (38.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 100 nodes, 51 on tree, 1e+50 best solution, best possible -22190.6 (146.38 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of -19388 found after 77612 iterations and 185 nodes (186.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 200 nodes, 96 on tree, -19388 best solution, best possible -22190.6 (190.70 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of -20658 found after 87595 iterations and 256 nodes (204.44 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of -21268 found after 89697 iterations and 267 nodes (207.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 300 nodes, 93 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22190.6 (221.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 400 nodes, 126 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22153.6 (267.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 500 nodes, 149 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22151.1 (325.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 600 nodes, 184 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22151.1 (377.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 700 nodes, 220 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22151.1 (416.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 800 nodes, 256 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22138 (452.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 900 nodes, 272 on tree, -21268 best solution, best possible -22138 (467.68 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of -21488 found by strong branching after 281269 iterations and 993 nodes (483.44 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 8724 rows 9144 columns, reduced to 108 rows 81 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of -21578 found by combine solutions after 281308 iterations and 994 nodes (484.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 136 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22138 (485.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1100 nodes, 142 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22132.6 (514.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1200 nodes, 148 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22100.6 (547.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1300 nodes, 159 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22100.6 (570.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1400 nodes, 159 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22100.6 (588.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1500 nodes, 172 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22062.8 (611.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1600 nodes, 168 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (631.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1700 nodes, 166 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (648.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1800 nodes, 169 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (674.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1900 nodes, 173 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (692.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 173 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (708.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2100 nodes, 179 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (729.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2200 nodes, 179 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (750.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2300 nodes, 178 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (769.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2400 nodes, 173 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (782.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2500 nodes, 207 on tree, -21578 best solution, best possible -22050.6 (807.18 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of -21618 found by strong branching after 438224 iterations and 2538 nodes (819.92 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 8724 rows 9144 columns, reduced to 191 rows 129 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of -21678 found by combine solutions after 438296 iterations and 2539 nodes (821.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2600 nodes, 137 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -22018.4 (840.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2700 nodes, 141 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21962.4 (869.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2800 nodes, 145 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21931 (892.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2900 nodes, 153 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21914.7 (918.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 162 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21898 (943.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3100 nodes, 177 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21890.4 (967.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3200 nodes, 182 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21878.6 (991.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3300 nodes, 190 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21866.1 (1014.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3400 nodes, 203 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21858.5 (1035.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3500 nodes, 214 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21850.4 (1054.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3600 nodes, 223 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21842.2 (1072.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3700 nodes, 233 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21836.1 (1095.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3800 nodes, 243 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21829.6 (1120.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3900 nodes, 251 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21826.8 (1134.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 259 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21822.3 (1151.58 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4100 nodes, 266 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21817.9 (1167.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4200 nodes, 275 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21813 (1189.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4300 nodes, 292 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21807 (1207.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4400 nodes, 301 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21799.7 (1227.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4500 nodes, 312 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21794.3 (1250.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4600 nodes, 345 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21793.1 (1269.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4700 nodes, 372 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21789.9 (1288.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4800 nodes, 395 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21787.8 (1307.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4900 nodes, 414 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21784.9 (1327.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 429 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21780.9 (1344.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5100 nodes, 445 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21779.1 (1360.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5200 nodes, 484 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21778 (1383.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5300 nodes, 504 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21775.6 (1400.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5400 nodes, 524 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21773.2 (1418.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5500 nodes, 545 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21771.1 (1437.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5600 nodes, 578 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21770.2 (1463.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5700 nodes, 592 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21768.1 (1484.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5800 nodes, 630 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21768 (1505.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5900 nodes, 646 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21766 (1523.92 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 663 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21764.7 (1540.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6100 nodes, 683 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21763.1 (1559.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6200 nodes, 693 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21760.8 (1578.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6300 nodes, 712 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21759.3 (1598.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6400 nodes, 726 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21758.2 (1619.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6500 nodes, 764 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21758 (1635.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6600 nodes, 791 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21758 (1650.04 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6700 nodes, 821 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21758 (1665.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6800 nodes, 850 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21757.3 (1682.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6900 nodes, 855 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21756.2 (1701.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 861 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21754.8 (1717.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7100 nodes, 871 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21753.7 (1733.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7200 nodes, 887 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21752.9 (1748.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7300 nodes, 899 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21751.5 (1765.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7400 nodes, 923 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21750.9 (1786.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7500 nodes, 941 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21750.2 (1801.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7600 nodes, 944 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21749.3 (1815.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7700 nodes, 953 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21748.4 (1843.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7800 nodes, 967 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21748.1 (1861.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7900 nodes, 987 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21748.1 (1877.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 1018 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21748 (1890.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8100 nodes, 1041 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21747.2 (1910.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8200 nodes, 1061 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21746.9 (1925.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8300 nodes, 1073 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21746.4 (1938.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8400 nodes, 1083 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21745.6 (1964.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8500 nodes, 1090 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21744.5 (1977.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8600 nodes, 1098 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21743.7 (1995.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8700 nodes, 1118 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21743.1 (2015.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8800 nodes, 1143 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21742.8 (2033.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8900 nodes, 1159 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21741.8 (2052.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 1164 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21740.9 (2063.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9100 nodes, 1192 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21740.7 (2081.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9200 nodes, 1194 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21740.1 (2093.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9300 nodes, 1211 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21739.7 (2109.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9400 nodes, 1223 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21739.2 (2123.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9500 nodes, 1227 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738.8 (2133.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9600 nodes, 1236 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738.4 (2146.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9700 nodes, 1240 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2158.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9800 nodes, 1278 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2174.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9900 nodes, 1289 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2187.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 1314 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2204.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10100 nodes, 1341 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2223.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10200 nodes, 1370 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21738 (2236.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10300 nodes, 1390 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21737.4 (2250.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10400 nodes, 1402 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21736.8 (2263.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10500 nodes, 1416 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21736.4 (2276.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10600 nodes, 1429 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21735.6 (2287.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10700 nodes, 1447 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21735.4 (2300.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10800 nodes, 1453 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21735 (2311.16 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10900 nodes, 1467 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21734.6 (2321.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 1481 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21734.3 (2333.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11100 nodes, 1491 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21734 (2345.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11200 nodes, 1506 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21733.6 (2360.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11300 nodes, 1512 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21733.1 (2370.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11400 nodes, 1532 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21733 (2392.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11500 nodes, 1548 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21732.3 (2406.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11600 nodes, 1553 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21732.1 (2418.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11700 nodes, 1565 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21731.7 (2433.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11800 nodes, 1585 on tree, -21678 best solution, best possible -21731.3 (2449.61 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of -21718 found after 1598173 iterations and 11812 nodes (2451.51 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 8724 rows 9144 columns, reduced to 227 rows 160 columns Cbc0010I After 11900 nodes, 437 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21731.3 (2462.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 422 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21730.9 (2471.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12100 nodes, 398 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21730.7 (2480.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12200 nodes, 387 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21730.3 (2489.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12300 nodes, 374 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21730 (2499.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12400 nodes, 359 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21729.5 (2508.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12500 nodes, 338 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728.8 (2517.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12600 nodes, 317 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728.2 (2525.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12700 nodes, 310 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2535.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12800 nodes, 319 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2544.34 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12900 nodes, 308 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2553.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 311 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2562.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13100 nodes, 301 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2570.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13200 nodes, 297 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2579.76 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13300 nodes, 286 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2588.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13400 nodes, 282 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2596.38 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13500 nodes, 268 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2603.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13600 nodes, 258 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2611.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13700 nodes, 254 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2618.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13800 nodes, 244 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2624.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13900 nodes, 235 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2633.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 229 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21728 (2641.35 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14100 nodes, 221 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21727.8 (2649.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14200 nodes, 205 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21726.8 (2657.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14300 nodes, 177 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21725.9 (2667.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14400 nodes, 156 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21724.7 (2677.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14500 nodes, 132 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21724.1 (2684.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14600 nodes, 101 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21723.1 (2694.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14700 nodes, 74 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21722.2 (2702.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14800 nodes, 44 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21721.3 (2710.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14900 nodes, 14 on tree, -21718 best solution, best possible -21720.5 (2717.71 seconds) Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective -21718, took 1757214 iterations and 14945 nodes (2720.70 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 42560 times (1390045 iterations), fathomed 17 nodes and fixed 238 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 121, 1.09238e+06 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from -22945.2 to -22199.1 Probing was tried 3664 times and created 26432 cuts of which 7146 were active after adding rounds of cuts (46.383 seconds) Gomory was tried 3462 times and created 16563 cuts of which 195 were active after adding rounds of cuts (117.183 seconds) Knapsack was tried 16 times and created 45 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.320 seconds) Clique was tried 3651 times and created 60731 cuts of which 163 were active after adding rounds of cuts (20.917 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 16 times and created 13 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.256 seconds) FlowCover was tried 16 times and created 4 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.172 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 16 times and created 1087 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (3.064 seconds) implication was tried 6490 times and created 1800 cuts of which 926 were active after adding rounds of cuts Result - Finished objective -21718 after 14945 nodes and 1757214 iterations - took 2727.66 seconds (total time 2740.54) Total time 2740.75 2740.74user 0.43system 45:41.25elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+122889minor)pagefaults 0swaps