Coin Cbc and Clp Solver version 2.20.00, build Sep 22 2008 command line - cbc done/cap6000.mps At line 15 NAME cap6000 At line 16 ROWS At line 2194 COLUMNS At line 32227 RHS At line 33229 BOUNDS At line 39230 ENDATA Problem cap6000 has 2176 rows, 6000 columns and 48243 elements Coin0008I cap6000 read with 0 errors Continuous objective value is -2.45154e+06 - 0.04 seconds Optimal - objective value -2.45154e+06 Cgl0003I 46 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 46 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 84 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 46 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 8 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 40 substitutions Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 40 substitutions Cgl0004I processed model has 1926 rows, 5799 columns (5799 integer) and 17316 elements Objective coefficients multiple of 1 Cutoff increment increased from 1e-05 to 0.999 Cbc0038I Pass 1: suminf. 0.02047 (1) obj. -2.44686e+06 iterations 136 Cbc0038I Pass 2: suminf. 0.26613 (1) obj. -2.37857e+06 iterations 6 Cbc0038I Solution found of -2.35432e+06 Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 5795 integers at bound fixed and 0 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 2 rows 4 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound improved solution from -2.35432e+06 to -2.4428e+06 (0.06 seconds) Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of -2.44368e+06 Cbc0038I Reduced cost fixing fixed 1792 variables on major pass 2 Cbc0038I Pass 3: suminf. 0.02047 (1) obj. -2.44686e+06 iterations 132 Cbc0038I Pass 4: suminf. 0.18644 (1) obj. -2.44662e+06 iterations 6 Cbc0038I Pass 5: suminf. 0.42629 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 80 Cbc0038I Pass 6: suminf. 0.42629 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 8 Cbc0038I Pass 7: suminf. 0.33764 (2) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 57 Cbc0038I Pass 8: suminf. 0.26250 (2) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 12 Cbc0038I Pass 9: suminf. 0.31113 (2) obj. -2.44461e+06 iterations 4 Cbc0038I Pass 10: suminf. 0.68748 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 100 Cbc0038I Pass 11: suminf. 0.58126 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 7 Cbc0038I Pass 12: suminf. 0.01932 (2) obj. -2.44402e+06 iterations 78 Cbc0038I Pass 13: suminf. 0.01932 (2) obj. -2.44402e+06 iterations 0 Cbc0038I Pass 14: suminf. 0.04735 (2) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 13 Cbc0038I Pass 15: suminf. 0.29457 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 105 Cbc0038I Pass 16: suminf. 0.23610 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 25 Cbc0038I Pass 17: suminf. 0.37999 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 47 Cbc0038I Pass 18: suminf. 0.37999 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 0 Cbc0038I Pass 19: suminf. 0.35699 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 37 Cbc0038I Pass 20: suminf. 0.35699 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 0 Cbc0038I Pass 21: suminf. 0.37999 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 62 Cbc0038I Pass 22: suminf. 0.28201 (3) obj. -2.44368e+06 iterations 84 Cbc0038I No solution found this major pass Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 5729 integers at bound fixed and 0 continuous Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 4 rows 70 columns Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.28 seconds) Cbc0038I After 0.28 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting with objective of -2.4428e+06 - took 0.28 seconds Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.4428e+06 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.29 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 2 rows 443 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.44472e+06 found by combine solutions after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.53 seconds) Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.4492e+06 found by combine solutions after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.66 seconds) Cbc0013I At root node, 0 cuts changed objective from -2.45154e+06 to -2.45154e+06 in 1 passes Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 4 row cuts, 58 column cuts (0 active) in 0.004 seconds - new frequency is 1 Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.004 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.004 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 0 row cuts, 0 column cuts (0 active) in 0.000 seconds - new frequency is -100 Optimal - objective value -2.45154e+06 Optimal - objective value -2.45154e+06 Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, -2.4492e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45154e+06 (0.67 seconds) Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.45028e+06 found by combine solutions after 4 iterations and 1 nodes (0.77 seconds) Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.45089e+06 found by combine solutions after 5 iterations and 2 nodes (0.88 seconds) Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.45094e+06 found by combine solutions after 6 iterations and 3 nodes (1.01 seconds) Cbc3008W Strong branching is fixing too many variables, too expensively! Cbc0010I After 100 nodes, 52 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (1.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 200 nodes, 99 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (1.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 300 nodes, 149 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (2.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 400 nodes, 199 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (2.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 500 nodes, 249 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (2.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 600 nodes, 299 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (2.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 700 nodes, 349 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (2.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 800 nodes, 398 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (3.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 900 nodes, 448 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (3.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 498 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (3.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1100 nodes, 547 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (3.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1200 nodes, 597 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (3.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1300 nodes, 647 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (4.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1400 nodes, 696 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (4.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1500 nodes, 746 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (4.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1600 nodes, 796 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (4.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1700 nodes, 846 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (4.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1800 nodes, 896 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 1900 nodes, 946 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 996 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2100 nodes, 1046 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2200 nodes, 1096 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.78 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2300 nodes, 1146 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (5.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2400 nodes, 1196 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (6.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2500 nodes, 1246 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (6.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2600 nodes, 1296 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (6.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2700 nodes, 1346 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (6.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2800 nodes, 1396 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (6.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 2900 nodes, 1446 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 1494 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3100 nodes, 1544 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3200 nodes, 1594 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3300 nodes, 1644 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3400 nodes, 1694 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (7.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3500 nodes, 1745 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (8.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3600 nodes, 1795 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (8.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3700 nodes, 1845 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (8.56 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3800 nodes, 1893 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (8.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 3900 nodes, 1943 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (8.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 1991 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.10 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4100 nodes, 2041 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.27 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4200 nodes, 2088 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4300 nodes, 2136 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.64 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4400 nodes, 2186 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.80 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4500 nodes, 2236 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (9.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4600 nodes, 2286 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (10.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4700 nodes, 2336 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (10.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4800 nodes, 2384 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (10.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 4900 nodes, 2434 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (10.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 2482 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (10.86 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5100 nodes, 2532 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5200 nodes, 2582 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5300 nodes, 2632 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5400 nodes, 2682 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5500 nodes, 2729 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5600 nodes, 2776 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (11.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5700 nodes, 2825 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (12.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5800 nodes, 2873 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (12.24 seconds) Cbc0010I After 5900 nodes, 2922 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (12.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 2972 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (12.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6100 nodes, 3021 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (12.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6200 nodes, 3070 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (13.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6300 nodes, 3117 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (13.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6400 nodes, 3165 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (13.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6500 nodes, 3216 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (13.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6600 nodes, 3263 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (13.89 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6700 nodes, 3311 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (14.07 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6800 nodes, 3361 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (14.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 6900 nodes, 3409 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (14.51 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 3459 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (14.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7100 nodes, 3508 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (14.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7200 nodes, 3558 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (15.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7300 nodes, 3608 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (15.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7400 nodes, 3657 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (15.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7500 nodes, 3705 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (15.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7600 nodes, 3753 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.00 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7700 nodes, 3801 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.22 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7800 nodes, 3850 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 7900 nodes, 3898 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.63 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 3947 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8100 nodes, 3995 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (16.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8200 nodes, 4045 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (17.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8300 nodes, 4096 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (17.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8400 nodes, 4145 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (17.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8500 nodes, 4196 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (17.88 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8600 nodes, 4246 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (18.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8700 nodes, 4295 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (18.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8800 nodes, 4343 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (18.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 8900 nodes, 4390 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (18.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 4440 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (18.96 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9100 nodes, 4489 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (19.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9200 nodes, 4535 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (19.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9300 nodes, 4583 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (19.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9400 nodes, 4631 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (19.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9500 nodes, 4676 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (20.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9600 nodes, 4725 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (20.33 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9700 nodes, 4772 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (20.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9800 nodes, 4820 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (20.71 seconds) Cbc0010I After 9900 nodes, 4869 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (20.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 4920 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (21.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10100 nodes, 4970 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (21.39 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10200 nodes, 5020 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (21.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10300 nodes, 5067 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (21.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10400 nodes, 5116 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (22.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10500 nodes, 5165 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (22.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10600 nodes, 5212 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (22.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10700 nodes, 5260 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (22.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10800 nodes, 5307 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (22.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 10900 nodes, 5356 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (23.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 5401 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45143e+06 (23.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11100 nodes, 5450 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45142e+06 (23.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11200 nodes, 5500 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45142e+06 (23.73 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11300 nodes, 5550 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (23.95 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11400 nodes, 5600 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (24.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11500 nodes, 5650 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (24.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11600 nodes, 5700 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (24.70 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11700 nodes, 5750 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (24.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11800 nodes, 5800 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (25.20 seconds) Cbc0010I After 11900 nodes, 5850 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (25.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 5898 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (25.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12100 nodes, 5947 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (25.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12200 nodes, 5997 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (26.18 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12300 nodes, 6045 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (26.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12400 nodes, 6094 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (26.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12500 nodes, 6144 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (26.91 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12600 nodes, 6194 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (27.17 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12700 nodes, 6244 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (27.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12800 nodes, 6292 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (27.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 12900 nodes, 6342 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (27.93 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 6391 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (28.14 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13100 nodes, 6441 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (28.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13200 nodes, 6490 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (28.62 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13300 nodes, 6538 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (28.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13400 nodes, 6586 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (29.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13500 nodes, 6636 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (29.36 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13600 nodes, 6685 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (29.57 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13700 nodes, 6735 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (29.82 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13800 nodes, 6785 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (30.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 13900 nodes, 6835 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (30.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 6882 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45141e+06 (30.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14100 nodes, 6931 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (30.75 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14200 nodes, 6980 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (31.01 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14300 nodes, 7030 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (31.23 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14400 nodes, 7078 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (31.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14500 nodes, 7128 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (31.72 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14600 nodes, 7178 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (31.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14700 nodes, 7228 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (32.21 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14800 nodes, 7277 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (32.42 seconds) Cbc0010I After 14900 nodes, 7325 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (32.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 7375 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (32.84 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15100 nodes, 7425 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (33.05 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15200 nodes, 7474 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (33.26 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15300 nodes, 7523 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (33.44 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15400 nodes, 7573 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (33.66 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15500 nodes, 7621 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (33.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15600 nodes, 7670 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (34.06 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15700 nodes, 7719 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (34.25 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15800 nodes, 7768 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (34.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 15900 nodes, 7816 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (34.67 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16000 nodes, 7866 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (34.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16100 nodes, 7916 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (35.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16200 nodes, 7966 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (35.30 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16300 nodes, 8013 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (35.50 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16400 nodes, 8060 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (35.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16500 nodes, 8109 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (35.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16600 nodes, 8159 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (36.12 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16700 nodes, 8206 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (36.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16800 nodes, 8255 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (36.49 seconds) Cbc0010I After 16900 nodes, 8305 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (36.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17000 nodes, 8352 on tree, -2.45094e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (36.89 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of -2.45102e+06 found by strong branching after 51383 iterations and 17017 nodes (36.94 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 2 rows 421 columns Cbc0012I Integer solution of -2.45134e+06 found by combine solutions after 51383 iterations and 17017 nodes (37.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17100 nodes, 1163 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.11 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17200 nodes, 1177 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17300 nodes, 1190 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.47 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17400 nodes, 1203 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17500 nodes, 1215 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17600 nodes, 1227 on tree, -2.45134e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (38.95 seconds) Cbc0016I Integer solution of -2.45136e+06 found by strong branching after 53960 iterations and 17683 nodes (39.08 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 4 rows 423 columns Cbc0010I After 17700 nodes, 755 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (39.37 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17800 nodes, 766 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (39.52 seconds) Cbc0010I After 17900 nodes, 773 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (39.68 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18000 nodes, 779 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (39.83 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18100 nodes, 790 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (39.99 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18200 nodes, 800 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (40.13 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18300 nodes, 810 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.4514e+06 (40.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18400 nodes, 824 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (40.46 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18500 nodes, 833 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (40.60 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18600 nodes, 842 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (40.79 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18700 nodes, 848 on tree, -2.45136e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (40.93 seconds) Cbc0004I Integer solution of -2.45138e+06 found after 58029 iterations and 18790 nodes (41.05 seconds) Cbc0038I Full problem 1926 rows 5799 columns, reduced to 5 rows 424 columns Cbc0010I After 18800 nodes, 489 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (41.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 18900 nodes, 491 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (41.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19000 nodes, 492 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (41.59 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19100 nodes, 496 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (41.77 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19200 nodes, 498 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (41.90 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19300 nodes, 500 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.03 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19400 nodes, 493 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19500 nodes, 488 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.32 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19600 nodes, 484 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.45 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19700 nodes, 482 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.61 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19800 nodes, 476 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 19900 nodes, 470 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (42.87 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20000 nodes, 463 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.02 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20100 nodes, 457 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.15 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20200 nodes, 449 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.28 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20300 nodes, 437 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.40 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20400 nodes, 428 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20500 nodes, 420 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.69 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20600 nodes, 410 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.81 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20700 nodes, 402 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (43.94 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20800 nodes, 391 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (44.08 seconds) Cbc0010I After 20900 nodes, 372 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45139e+06 (44.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21000 nodes, 351 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.31 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21100 nodes, 318 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.41 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21200 nodes, 301 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.55 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21300 nodes, 273 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.65 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21400 nodes, 234 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.74 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21500 nodes, 208 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.85 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21600 nodes, 183 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (44.98 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21700 nodes, 162 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.09 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21800 nodes, 134 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.19 seconds) Cbc0010I After 21900 nodes, 102 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.29 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22000 nodes, 72 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.43 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22100 nodes, 51 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.53 seconds) Cbc0010I After 22200 nodes, 12 on tree, -2.45138e+06 best solution, best possible -2.45138e+06 (45.63 seconds) Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective -2451377, took 75024 iterations and 22232 nodes (45.65 seconds) Cbc0032I Strong branching done 4692 times (13324 iterations), fathomed 35 nodes and fixed 476 variables Cbc0035I Maximum depth 162, 655226 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from -2.45154e+06 to -2.45154e+06 Probing was tried 3958 times and created 1925 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (3.492 seconds) Gomory was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.004 seconds) Knapsack was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Clique was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.004 seconds) FlowCover was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) implication was tried 10297 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts Result - Finished objective -2451377 after 22232 nodes and 75024 iterations - took 45.81 seconds (total time 45.89) Total time 45.92 45.91user 0.29system 0:46.21elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+118063minor)pagefaults 0swaps